4 ms·
> but there's no downside to removal of contamination, so they'd likely support it given the choice. There may be a downside, if the cost of compliance is too
by presto8 7y ago
> but there's no downside to removal of contamination, so they'd likely support it given the choice.
There may be a downside, if the cost of compliance is too high and the business decides to stop offering the product.
- jka 7y agoI think I understand what you're saying, but could you elaborate on it to make clear who suffers the downside and why?