3 ms·
> I am apprehensive about the neutrality of a show... I'd also assume any show that bills itself as "Paul Krugman's column refuted, week after week!" is more o
by CharlesColeman 7y ago
> I am apprehensive about the neutrality of a show...
I'd also assume any show that bills itself as "Paul Krugman's column refuted, week after week!" is more of an ideological security blanket than real intellectual engagement or critique.
- andymockli 7y agoI'd personally categorize Paul Krugman as an idealogue. You might think the same of Bob Murphy and Tom Woods, but the aim was to offer a counterpoint to Krugman's ideas. I believe you'd find the intellectual engagement and critiques within the podcast, not the subtitle.
- CharlesColeman 7y ago> I believe you'd find the intellectual engagement and critiques within the podcast, not the subtitle. No, I doubt it. If they think they can refute [1] like clockwork future columns they've never seen, it's almost certain they're just rehashing dogmas for the faithful. I have better things to spend my time on than that. [1] a very strong word, by the way