5 ms·
Dont use site Moving those sliders will nuke your CPU probably because the entire <body> is essentially just: <script src="/prism.js"></script> <scri
by svnpenn 7y ago
Dont use site
Moving those sliders will nuke your CPU
probably because the entire <body> is essentially just:
<script src="/prism.js"></script>
<script src="/static/js/20.c80b9d97.chunk.js"></script>
<script src="/static/js/main.635019b5.chunk.js"></script>
<script src="https://d3js.org/d3.v5.min.js"></script>
<script src="https://d3js.org/d3-array.v2.min.js"></script>
- fastbeef 7y agoMy 2015 Thinkpad with an i5 got 12% utilitaztion?
- svnpenn 7y agoYeah, on an 8 core thats 100% utilization of one of the cores...
- devwastaken 7y agoWorks fine on Android Firefox. They should put in a debounce function on the sliders so it doesn't update as it's moving.
- valine 7y agoThat would undermine the purpose of the site which is to help build an intuitive understanding of the svg viewport. There is educational value in having the graphic update while the slider moves.
- sagebird 7y agoThere is nothing preventing setting a debounce function to update frequently. For example, why would you want to calculate updates more than 30 times a second, or why would you want multiple updates during a single animation frame ( ie update faster than the browser repaints)? Debouncing is an insurance policy against insane things that you don’t want to happen. A smart debounce function can even modify itself in response to how long an expensive function is taking on average for a particular device— to increase the debounce time if there is not sufficient time to complete one calculation before another begins. I’ll go as far to say that a properly tuned debounce function that is triggered on leading edge will, if anything, decrease perceptible lag, not add to it. It will also minimize (though not guarantee w/o additional mechanisms) out-of-sequence updates. Out of sequence updates can lead to janky/confusing behavior. — edit: I see that I went off the deep-end, assuming that you were against using debounce functions in general. I now see that grandparent was conflating debouncing and not updating until slider comes to a stop. These are of course not the same thing. Apologies. I hope my comments on debouncing are useful to someone though.
- baddox 7y agoPresumably just listening to the slider state and updating some global variables is fast enough to not need throttling, but I would definitely update the SVG DOM inside a draw loop running in requestAnimationFrame since there's no point in doing it any faster than that anyway. I'm not an expert on high-frame-rate web drawing, but I've played with it a fair amount, and AFAIK there's no need to do any fancy debouncing logic beyond requestAnimationFrame.
- sagebird 7y agoA need may arise if a calculation took longer than a frame. (I’ve encountered this making a little programming language that generates graphics that updates in real time as you type. I’d imagine similar issues with web based latex-> pdf generators that update the pdf as you type )
- baddox 7y agoIf a calculation takes longer than a frame, then you’re going to stutter no matter what you do, right? I feel like the browser will do its best to let you interact with the slider between frames, but really I can’t think of a good way to have a smooth interactive UI with calculations that take more than a frame.
- 40four 7y agoI also experienced performance issues when using the sliders. My whole computer acted like it was going to freeze (Firefox/ Windows)
- AceJohnny2 7y agoNo problem and smooth as butter in Firefox Windows.
- cjfd 7y agoAlso works just fine with me. Firefox on linux here.
- oneeyedpigeon 7y agoWorks fine on my ageing iPad mini. What was it about those 5 scripts that you thought would cause a problem? What machine/browser are you using?
- wizzwizz4 7y agoI don't like the architecture either, but this is one of the better sites using it that I've seen. It ran more smoothly than most non-interactive news sites, and the CPU usage was pretty much zero except when I was interacting with it. What about your setup do you think might be causing this problem, given that very few other people are experiencing it?
- adamch 7y agoStrange. I'm on a Macbook and this page nukes my CPU on FF Nightly, but not on Chrome.
- Nullabillity 7y agoWorks fine for me on FF/Linux.
- bryanrasmussen 7y agoFF Developer 71.0b10 MacBook Pro from mid 2018 running Mojave, works great.
- irrational 7y agoHmm, I didn't notice anything on Firefox on my Mac. I have a ton of tabs open and about and 15 programs running, including handbrake rendering some videos. I opened up Activity Monitor and watched what happened while loading and then manipulating the sliders. Nothing. Absolutely nothing budged under CPU, GPU, or Memory. The site was smooth as a hot knife through butter. Maybe you should list your OS, your browser, and your hardware specs.
- tyingq 7y agoIt runs fine on my crap Motorola Android. So, something is afoot with GPs device.
- Mikhail_Edoshin 7y agoSame problem here, had to restart the browser (Firefox/Windows). Ate all memory.
- wattenberger 7y agoah, the joys of frontend web development! I added a 30ms debounce, just to help out a bit. I'm seeing some serious jank in Firefox, which smells like the beginning of a rabbit hole. Hopefully I'll find some time to dig in there.