2 ms·
Initial thoughts: - show me some functionality or it didn't happen - no examples of how it works? - generally hostile atmosphere (you're priming with words l
by lhorie 16y ago
Initial thoughts:
- show me some functionality or it didn't happen
- no examples of how it works?
- generally hostile atmosphere (you're priming with words like "sucks" and "argue", which are negative) - doesn't look fun
- Charuru 16y agoThanks. You can try joining the beta, we'll let you know when it is available. It's a little unfortunate that the term argument is perceived so negatively. It is the formal term though. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Argument http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Argument These types of arguments are by nature combative and adversarial, and won't work for Dale Carnegie following people who want to network and make friends. It's designed for people who are interested in logic and truth and understanding as opposed to a fun social interaction. It is about more effective and less frustrating arguments. If you come from the perspective of, arguments are bad in general and you shouldn't argue, perhaps it's because of how terribly it has worked in the past? Sign up, and perhaps it'll change your mind.