3 ms·
I'm not wrong. Read the "specs". >By your logic the year 2000 should be part of the 90's which it wasn't. It was according to the gregorian calendar.
by gsich 7y ago
I'm not wrong. Read the "specs".
>By your logic the year 2000 should be part of the 90's which it wasn't.
It was according to the gregorian calendar.
- summonedskul 7y agobut you're still wrong - this decade ends at the last moment of 2019..that's the agreed popular opinion - didn't you even read the Wikipedia link?