> that there's something about stable, market-oriented democracies Yeah, things are stable when economy is good (worked for Yugoslavia too) but what's going to

> that there's something about stable, market-oriented democracies Yeah, things are stable when economy is good (worked for Yugoslavia too) but what's going to happen in case of huge economic downturn like in the 30thies with millions out of work? Attitudes of people change as a reaction to the changes in their environment (real or perceived). And you don't need a majority, you just need a critical mass of people to stray and start chain of events that effects everyone. I certainly believe that market-oriented democracies are more stable than Yugoslavia, I'm just not sure how much more stable they are. Maybe I'm just to pessimistic after everything that happened in the last 30 years here.