4 ms·
The mentioned cases in this article all talk of re-activation, the others I assume legit broke guidelines meant to protect its younger users. For instance, the
by BickNowstrom 7y ago
The mentioned cases in this article all talk of re-activation, the others I assume legit broke guidelines meant to protect its younger users.
For instance, the article mentions Cinderella Jewels, which has a new account showcasing her "pole journey". NSFW: https://www.instagram.com/p/B4xM_b4AtC-/ https://www.instagram.com/p/B4xM_b4AtC-/ and her Youtube banner: https://yt3.ggpht.com/L6jM6xMK_QBRZieP8x8f8_f6x1BYQi30_K7WGLDQ1OhklaFhpjAFtT3Bxpqi77YbWcFHckcN4Q https://yt3.ggpht.com/L6jM6xMK_QBRZieP8x8f8_f6x1BYQi30_K7WGL...
Here is Bloggeronpole showing "body positivity", while complaining they won't let her post a video of her working out in a bikini NSFW: https://www.instagram.com/p/B2td-HPgzDP/ https://www.instagram.com/p/B2td-HPgzDP/
Here is Ginger Banks' instagram, who claimed in the article: "I've never posted explicit images on Instagram. But even a picture of me wearing leggings could be extremely provocative to someone, and worthy of being reported": NSFW: https://www.instagram.com/thegingerbanks/ https://www.instagram.com/thegingerbanks/ and here you can support her art, for just 100$ a month you can help end the stigma that is surrounding sex and view art that makes you question yourself: https://www.patreon.com/GingerBanks https://www.patreon.com/GingerBanks (NSFW).