3 ms·
It would be a great idea to legally force social networks to automatically apply this kind of AI and show the results in the feed for the reasons you mentioned.
by mosselman 7y ago
It would be a great idea to legally force social networks to automatically apply this kind of AI and show the results in the feed for the reasons you mentioned.
- brokenkebab 7y agoWhy stop here? Let's legally forbid makeup. Think about tone-evening creams, for example, what they do to truth!
- mosselman 7y agoClear strawman fallacy here. I did not say 'forbid'. I said that it should be made clear that the images are doctored. Besides, there is a big difference between make-up, that anyone could theoretically apply to look like someone in real-life and what people use photoshop for in the images we are talking about.
- brokenkebab 7y agoI would call it reductio ad absurdum. But that's not the point as I wasn't refuting any arguments you made (you didn't any), but making fun of what I see as a knee-jerk reaction of calling for a new law on every minor occasion. Btw, your final para: do you mean that only privileged people can apply "beatification" effects on their phitos? FWIW make-up is much more expensive.
- fbi-director 7y agoAfter a week - at most - none of the millions of users sees the "photoshopped image" anymore, it'll become ubiquitous. Mostly due to the fact that each and every image will have that label / text
- Nasrudith 7y agoHow about starting with making a plug in app first before rushing to legislate imaginary problems which are by definition poorly understood? It brings to mind the cloning bans based on Hollywood logic where they assume clones have all memories and the same exact scars and birthmarks.