5 ms·
I was going to name John Resig too. He was one of the few programmers who seemed to get it, that a library should be easy to use, even fun. The function names a
by combatentropy 7y ago
I was going to name John Resig too. He was one of the few programmers who seemed to get it, that a library should be easy to use, even fun. The function names are short, chainability helps keep the whole snippet short, the flexible arguments and graceful handling of empty sets --- all these things made it a breeze. The ergonomic improvement over its predecessor, Prototype.js, was remarkable.
The internals were impressive too. Making a library that worked with all browsers in those days was no small feat. Furthermore, in its releases, jQuery was always talking about speed --- how must faster it was than the last version. A prioritization of speed is always a good sign.
- folkhack 7y ago> The ergonomic improvement over its predecessor, Prototype.js, was remarkable. It was night and day... I'd also throw MooTools in there too. Not to throw them under the bus as they were baby steps in the right direction. But, jQuery just "got it" and was incredibly well designed under the hood as well.