> Tonkin Gulf incidents Why did you include such a well documented false flag in your list of potentially fake news? [Edit: the document discussed in the follo

> Tonkin Gulf incidents Why did you include such a well documented false flag in your list of potentially fake news? [Edit: the document discussed in the following quote is from the NSA itself, so the government has admitted (39 years later) that this was a hoax.] From the NYT: > The most provocative document is a 2001 article in which an agency historian argued that the agency's intelligence officers "deliberately skewed" the evidence passed on to policy makers and the public to falsely suggest that North Vietnamese ships had attacked American destroyers on Aug. 4, 1964. > Based on the assertion that such an attack had occurred, President Lyndon B. Johnson ordered airstrikes on North Vietnam and Congress passed a broad resolution authorizing military action. > The historian, Robert J. Hanyok, wrote the article in an internal publication and it was classified top secret despite the fact that it dealt with events in 1964. Word of Mr. Hanyok's findings leaked to historians outside the agency, who requested the article under the Freedom of Information Act in 2003. https://web.archive.org/web/20081211090233/http://www.nytimes.com/2005/12/02/politics/02tonkin.html?pagewanted=print https://web.archive.org/web/20081211090233/http://www.nytime...