7 ms·
The only thing I track over the years is the price of a regular sized candy bar at the grocery store checkout. When I was a kid in the 70’s and 80’s, they were
by madengr 7y ago
The only thing I track over the years is the price of a regular sized candy bar at the grocery store checkout. When I was a kid in the 70’s and 80’s, they were $0.25, and now they are $1.25 or more.
- AlexB138 7y agoI also suspect the quality has dropped. It may just be because I'm not too big on sweets, or my palate becoming dull with age, but when I had a bit of Halloween candy recently it all tasted like wax and sugar. Even things that were favorites when I was a kid (Butterfingers and Whoppers in particular) were bland and flavorless compared to what I remembered.
- boomboomsubban 7y agoThe "fun sized" versions of candy generally given out at Halloween always tasted stale to me, likely due to the production and distribution methods for the holiday. I wouldn't use those to draw conclusions.
- karthikb 7y agoMore likely they were actually stale, lots of people buy a big stash of candy and hand it out over several years until it runs out.
- boomboomsubban 7y agoThey were stale, but even freshly purchased ones are often stale. Candy goes stale faster than you'd think, and seasonal candy often sits around longer and is stored with less care than a regular candy bar.
- LegitShady 7y agonobody does this. Keeps halloween candy between years? why? there's no advantage to having a "big stash". halloween candy decomposes into empty wrappers naturally anyways. It has a half life of 9 days.
- casefields 7y agoAfter Halloween specials on candy are amazing. Theoretically, people could just always buy those deals and save them for the next year. That holds for all after season items.
- mamon 7y agoThis is a perfect strategy for buying clothes, but candies? nobody stores candies this long :)
- LegitShady 7y agoIf you were buying winter tires sure but Halloween candy is on sale every year and the cost for most homes is negligible so it's unlikely people are stockpiling it
- karthikb 7y agoThere’s no advantage to a big stash, but it’s easy to overestimate the number of trick-or-treaters, have a ton of candy left on your hands, and just stick it in the closet for next year.
- LegitShady 7y agoNo it's not
- rtkwe 7y agoThey probably are a little more stale than the large bars because many are in the unsealed paper wrappers.
- TillE 7y agoI swear Twix used to be much better. I haven't been meticulously tracking it over the years or anything, but there is a simple logic that if you can cut costs by making something worse, and there's pretty much no higher-quality alternative, it'll probably still sell.
- bsder 7y agoThe quality has definitely dropped. There have been discrete points where I would buy a Reese's peanut butter cup and go "Yuck!". We're currently in such a phase right now where I won't buy them anymore. I really notice when they tamper with the peanut butter. But there have been a couple of times where they over-sugared the chocolate. Normally, I would have blown it off as "getting old" except that I mentioned that I wouldn't buy one anymore and two children (14 and 10) agreed that they started sucking that year.
- seandougall 7y agoYeah, peanuts really show the quality difference. Half of the fun size Snickers I’ve gotten the past few years have tasted straight up rancid.
- altShiftDev 7y agoThe only one that's as good as I remember from childhood is Kinder eggs. That chocolate is amazing and waaaay better than we deserved as kids. Still get one for xmas every year although could do without the plastic toy.
- carlob 7y agoFunnily enough I've always thought Kinder chocolate was way too sweet (even as a kid) and I remember being flummoxed by the tagline of Kinder ads (in Italy, but that's where they're from), which was "more milk, less cocoa". Kid me was thinking: "wait! Isn't milk way cheaper than and less delicious than cocoa?". But then again it was probably aimed at health conscious parents...
- smabie 7y agoIs cocoa bad for you? It’s the milk and the sugar that are unhealthy, as far as I know.
- carlob 7y agoCocoa is pretty fat and (at least in Italy) there is a popular belief that it might cause acne. I think it's also interesting to note that Nutella (also from Ferrero) has a history of being a post-WW2 pure chocolate substitute at a time when hazelnuts were much cheaper and easier to source. It seems to be in the company's DNA to produce chocolate-based confections while touting chocolate as the bad guy.
- Spivak 7y agoCocoa powder is just fat and carbs with basically no other nutritional content but it's not really any worse for you than other sources of the same thing. The milk is probably the most nutritionally rich thing in your average chocolate bar.
- distances 7y agoKinder eggs are European chocolate, aren't they? European chocolate is much higher quality than the American counterpart, so maybe that would explain?
- astura 7y agoThat's probably just your taste buds dulling with age, I have the same experience, many things I couldn't get enough of as kid now tastes bland (and not just prepackaged food. It's particularly noticable with sweets. https://www.npr.org/sections/thesalt/2017/05/05/526750174/why-taste-buds-dull-as-we-age https://www.npr.org/sections/thesalt/2017/05/05/526750174/wh...
- mc32 7y agoHas the weight remained the same?
- sfotm 7y agoNope - in fact, I hear that they prefer to change the size rather than the price because consumers tend not to notice it as much. https://www.bbc.co.uk/newsround/25401945 https://www.bbc.co.uk/newsround/25401945
- houli 7y agoThis is what happened in Ireland when new taxes on sugary drinks came in. Drinks that came in 2L bottles now came in 1.75L bottles at the same price. The diet versions with no sugar remained in 2L bottles. Companies like Coke are now only making variants like vanilla or cherry flavours using their diet or zero sugar products
- dannyw 7y agoThis is why if you want to tax sweet drinks, you should charge it on artificial sweeteners too because otherwise it’s just a handout for aspartame.
- chrisseaton 7y ago...but that’s the idea. They want people to drink the artificially sweetened version instead. That’s what the tax is for. If they taxed both the same it wouldn’t work.
- crooked-v 7y agoI think you've missed sight of the point of those taxes, which is to reduce consumption of actual excess sugar, not to tax things that taste sweet.
- michaelmrose 7y agoBoth are unhealthy its not clear that fake sweeteners are better for you. Why tax a different kind of unhealthy less?
- jefftk 7y agoThat's plain inflation: $0.25 in 1975 would be $1.20 today
- ken 7y agoAnd yet to a kid wanting a candy bar, it's measurably worse. In the 1980's you would occasionally find a quarter on the ground. Today you never find a dollar on the ground, or even quarters.
- deleted 7y ago[deleted]