It is plauisble to think there was foul play with Epstein but frankly the conspiracy theorist label fits the advocates very well. It is a matter of process and

It is plauisble to think there was foul play with Epstein but frankly the conspiracy theorist label fits the advocates very well. It is a matter of process and rationality. They assume literally everyone whose name they recognize is a secret pedophile without even a scintilia of unreliable evidencd in deranged guilt by association. That they treat "wanting more conclusive evidence in speculative matters" as "siding against" only proves the point. It fits the "more about emotional validation and confirmation bias than investigation" mold to them.