> I would probably agree with the verdict if the defendant wasn't in a child pornography case and hadn't stated (FTA) "we both know what's on it, why would I [r

> I would probably agree with the verdict if the defendant wasn't in a child pornography case and hadn't stated (FTA) "we both know what's on it, why would I [reveal my password]". Which is the problem, they only try to push the boundaries on "indefensible" cases (because nobody cares about a pedophile) but then use their newly minted powers on everyone else.