4 ms·
"How can anyone manage with 25 GB per month?" Very, very happily thanks. I used to "manage" quite happily on 1.5GB/month (Wireless in Australia). Now I'm in t
by Swannie 16y ago
"How can anyone manage with 25 GB per month?"
Very, very happily thanks. I used to "manage" quite happily on 1.5GB/month (Wireless in Australia).
Now I'm in the UK, I'm doing about 25 (thanks to BBC's streaming, which I could cut out a lot of I was PVRing more). It would only become a pain when I want to download something like a VM image.
- gregsadetsky 16y agoI didn't mean that to be a snark! :-) It was simply a(n emotional?) reaction (has been said many times, etc.) to the reality of bandwidth being reduced in Canada over the past... 15 years. I used to have the-nicest-DSL-in-high-school, provided by Bell, in the late 90's -- 74$/month for 2 Mbps down, 1 Mbps up, unlimited traffic. Today, their "Fibe" offering (it sounds like "Fiber" as in FTTH! but it isn't! %^&^%$#!!) is 55$/month for 25 Mbps down, 7 Mbps up. The speed is definitely better -- but the 100 GB transfer limit means that your effective average monthly speed is 38 kB/sec (100 Gb / seconds in 30 days...) Why doesn't signing up for 5 Mbps mean that you get a full constant 5 Mbps, and that you can use up to the full 1.6 TB of transfer per month (5 Mbps * 30 days...)? Isn't the reason because customers are sold oversubscribed connections?
- Swannie 16y agoYep, overselling for the lose I'm afraid.