3 ms·
>United States control of the Philippines was never intended to be permanent. From the beginning, the colonial mission was seen as one of paternalistic "tutelag
by hdrujvw-4579 7y ago
>United States control of the Philippines was never intended to be permanent. From the beginning, the colonial mission was seen as one of paternalistic "tutelage"
That snippet sounds a little self-serving, "we're just a force of good and we want good for all". The situation is more complicated, and the more powerful countries -including the US- around the world at that time were all in pursuit of expanding their territory and power.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/New_Imperialism https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/New_Imperialism
- _iyig 7y agoYes, that's why the U.S. also fought a brutal war against Filipino independence. Regardless, they ultimately delivered on the promise of independence, and at the apex of American military and political power.