3 ms·
Your business model is part of why I think it’s bad advice: every third party service used is an operational liability. The less standardised the integration, t
by stephenr 7y ago
Your business model is part of why I think it’s bad advice: every third party service used is an operational liability. The less standardised the integration, the harder it is to swap to a competitor if required. The more standardised the integration, the easier it is.
To use your email argument earlier: if a company doesn’t want to handle its own mail servers (which is a common choice these days) the cost of moving between vendors can be pretty low. A few DNS records and some config/environment vars, and voila. It’s very possible to do it with zero downtime.
- nguyenkims 7y agoI’m not sure to follow your points. The technology is based on oauth2/openid standard which would allow developers to switch quite easily. The business model is subscription based which is pretty standard. Sending email is not just about « clean » ip address or passing by a third party provider.For example some email clients can display the emails differently so one need to take this into account. Anw I don’t think the discussion will lead to anything. Again the article represents a point of view that some will not agree and I totally understand.