Using the examples of Steve Jobs and Leonardo da Vinci (as depicted through Walter Isaacson’s biographies on them) it seems like the “opposite” may also be true

Using the examples of Steve Jobs and Leonardo da Vinci (as depicted through Walter Isaacson’s biographies on them) it seems like the “opposite” may also be true. Being immensely curious about various subjects and applying them to one another would definitely have merit by the same examples PG is using in this article. One can definitely make the argument by saying Steve Jobs was obsessed with design - but i’m not sure it was an obsession with design as a discipline. The same with Leonardo can be said about painting, was the obsession to make his paintings better? Or was it just a culmination about being curious about many things?