3 ms·
"Heavily moderated" does it a huge disservice. The narrative is controlled, with any dissenting opinions removed and accounts banned. The sub is completely cens
by lawn 7y ago
"Heavily moderated" does it a huge disservice. The narrative is controlled, with any dissenting opinions removed and accounts banned. The sub is completely censored, see for example:
https://www.reddit.com/r/btc/comments/83vgdm/a_collection_of_evidence_regarding_bitcoins/ https://www.reddit.com/r/btc/comments/83vgdm/a_collection_of...
https://medium.com/@johnblocke/a-brief-and-incomplete-history-of-censorship-in-r-bitcoin-c85a290fe43 https://medium.com/@johnblocke/a-brief-and-incomplete-histor...
https://www.trustnodes.com/2019/05/01/the-cryptocurrency-sub-tests-censorship-after-bitcoin-core-supporter-suddenly-becomes-top-mod https://www.trustnodes.com/2019/05/01/the-cryptocurrency-sub...
https://www.reddit.com/r/noncensored_bitcoin/comments/7414nf/september_2017_stats_post/ https://www.reddit.com/r/noncensored_bitcoin/comments/7414nf...
- grubles 7y agoThat, of course, has nothing to do with Blockstream.
- lawn 7y agoExcept that all Blockstream projects are not only allowed, but promoted on r/bitcoin. If the subs own rules were followed they should be banned. For example how Liquid, a centralized sidechain that goes against the idea of cryptocurrencies, is promoted as a "solution" to many of Bitcoins problems. But any critique of it is banned. It's obvious that the mods are somehow associated with Blockstream. Only a Blockstream employee such as yourself would disagree.