4 ms·
Flagged. An article about {free themes} crammed with {free themes} keywords, without any real substance (so the cost and implications are, in short, that if we
by petervandijck 16y ago
Flagged.
An article about {free themes} crammed with {free themes} keywords, without any real substance (so the cost and implications are, in short, that if we had to provide support for {free themes} that would be a lot of work that our {free themes} would cause us).
I don't know why this stuff gets upvoted. {free themes}!
- adii 16y agoWow, considering our very non-spammy business and revenue model, I'm surprised you find it this way. Actually pretty funny, as we've never spent 1 minute or $1 actually SEO'ing our own website. I couldn't care less about supposed keywords.
- petervandijck 16y agoPerhaps I got the wrong impression, in that case, apologies.
- pkamb 16y ago"we've never spent 1 minute or $1 actually SEO'ing our own website." Uh, why? Isn't that something that a company should care about, getting into the top Google results? Not saying you should be submitting to shady link farms, but not spending a single minute on it...
- true_religion 16y agoThey probably care about "white hat" SEO such as having appropriate headers, and descriptive urls. However, all that is important for their actual store front and not their blog.
- thedeuce 16y agoI don't know why silly shit like this gets upvoted either. I come to HN for good content (less and less of it sadly) not silly cry babies about how they can't sell their fail product.
- Dylanlacey 16y agoI imagine it gets upvoted because they have a very salient point about the real costs of non-corporeal freebies.