> Anyone interested in powerwall vulnerabilities would find them trivially. What about those who become invested in powerwall vulnerabilities because they read

> Anyone interested in powerwall vulnerabilities would find them trivially. What about those who become invested in powerwall vulnerabilities because they read an article on HN that showed how easy it is? > When you disclose such things quietly with the vendor, it mostly just saves their face. I don't see how. They still get put on blast for ever being vulnerable in the first place. If you're goal is to get them in more trouble at the expense of their consumers, then that seems like pretty irresponsible disclosure to me. > Not everyone values saving Tesla's face. And not everyone cares one way or another about Tesla. This is about responsible disclosure. It's about protecting the consumers. It has nothing to do with the vendor.