8 ms·
Py3 is currently more performant than py2. There are a number of py3 only features pushed for by the scientific community (@ is the most obvious, but there are
by joshuamorton 7y ago
Py3 is currently more performant than py2.
There are a number of py3 only features pushed for by the scientific community (@ is the most obvious, but there are others).
- sprash 7y ago> Py3 is currently more performant than py2. No it's not. It is a clear regression. The minuscule performance improvements stem from the enforcement of xrange() vs range(). But using xrange() on 2.x is still faster.
- joshuamorton 7y agoNo, starting in 3.6 or 3.7, there are general performance improvements at the c level in the interpreter.