4 ms·

That sounds common-sense to me, but it seems un-meritocratic to assume it a priori.

• downerending 7y ago
  I agree with you. I think everyone should have a chance at what they'd like to do, without being blocked because "people like them" (in whatever way) tend to do poorly. That said, age matters. Very, very few people can start programming at 18 and progress to the top 20% of the field. I can't think of anyone who's done so, though I'm sure there are exceptions.
  • mac01021 7y ago
    Niklaus Wirth comes to mind. Admittedly, programming as a profession was very different at that time.
    • downerending 7y ago
      Hmm. Wikipedia says he had a BSEE at 21. No info on his early years, but I suspect he's one of the people we'd say started young. I didn't "program" either before 18, since I grew up in a household (and part of the country) without any access to computers. But I was indeed drawn to it young, and "learned to program" by reading magazines and sending off for free vendor literature (which did indeed have lots of nuggets of knowledge about all things tech).
• sharkmerry 7y ago
  i agree, but I believe the issue here is limited resources. Not everyone can have the world's best education so we use the resources we have on those that early identify as talented. Not saying its good, just it may be a resource management issue
• deleted 7y ago
  [deleted]