> The problem with these approaches is that “simplicity” never gets a rigorous definition Last I counted there were 48 proposed methods of defining simplicity.

> The problem with these approaches is that “simplicity” never gets a rigorous definition Last I counted there were 48 proposed methods of defining simplicity. I created one as well and am biased and think it is the best way to rigorously define simplicity/complexity: https://github.com/treenotation/research/blob/master/papers/paper3/countingComplexity.pdf https://github.com/treenotation/research/blob/master/papers/...