4 ms·
I was at Gitlab Commit London and myself and colleagues raised this with a few Gitlab employees. They seem to be aware their jump from Premium to Ultimate is to
by tikkabhuna 7y ago
I was at Gitlab Commit London and myself and colleagues raised this with a few Gitlab employees. They seem to be aware their jump from Premium to Ultimate is too big. At their feedback booth I passed on that it would be ideal to pay for what you use.
We use a separate issue tracker so any of that isn't relevant for us, but some of the security would be ideal.
Likewise, we have user accounts for non-development departments (Legal/Compliance/etc) that wouldn't be interested in SAST, for example. If we jumped to Ultimate we would have to pay monthly for those users to access features that never would use.
As I said, they do seem to be aware of this. I wouldn't be surprised if they came up with a different arrangement for Ultimate in the near future.
- nicolasd 7y agoI’ve raised similar concerns as well, especially with the same argument about non-development departments. However, with the Ultimate plan you also get free guest users, which could serve well for most users who are not developers.
- daricknance 7y agoShould look at Clubhouse for org wide project management . Integrates tightly with GitLab. Soon to release full Confluence replacement too
- apple4ever 7y agoThat's also part of the problem. They don't have a good strategy around these lite users.