Who is complaining about SpaceX? The point is challenging a particular confusion which seems prevalent round here. Suppose SpaceX had used a very similar proto

Who is complaining about SpaceX? The point is challenging a particular confusion which seems prevalent round here. Suppose SpaceX had used a very similar prototype, but some process or engineer had caught the fault. Few here would be taking the lack of an explosion as evidence that SpaceX are not innovative. Instead, if anything, they would be praising the superb processes in addition to the cool prototype. So, there is always room to improve. The reaction to this essentially anodyne point here has been really interesting.