4 ms·
I had to giggle a bit. The article claims that "[...] you'd have to scroll down to #6 before you found a provider that wouldn't pay them [...]" on an "unnamed r
by MrGilbert 7y ago
I had to giggle a bit. The article claims that "[...] you'd have to scroll down to #6 before you found a provider that wouldn't pay them [...]" on an "unnamed review site". The service in their list at #6 would be "Mullvad".
Looking at their own list[1], "Mullvad" is the only VPN provider listed at the top of the list under "Recommended VPN Services".
Just something that caught my eye and which I considered an interesting coincidence.
[1]: https://www.privacytools.io/providers/vpn/ https://www.privacytools.io/providers/vpn/
- dngray 7y agoYes and this is because it meets the criteria https://www.privacytools.io/providers/vpn/#info https://www.privacytools.io/providers/vpn/#info specifically the item that got it there was that they had external auditing. > Mullvad's VPN clients have been audited by Cure53 and Assured AB in a pentest report published at cure53.de. The security researchers concluded: https://cure53.de/pentest-report_mullvad_v2.pdf https://cure53.de/pentest-report_mullvad_v2.pdf We would like to see more VPN providers do this. Then we could have more good choices to choose from. A lot of the larger ones could certainly afford it.
- gitanovic 7y agoThe audit looks actually legit, but still they are located in a 14 eyes jurisdiction, not really the best for privacy
- gitanovic 7y agoI had exactly the same thought interesting "coincidence"