This article is really devoid of substance. I expect more from the Economist magazine normally. They provide anecdotes about companies and countries that got by

This article is really devoid of substance. I expect more from the Economist magazine normally. They provide anecdotes about companies and countries that got by without a large number of MBAs. They don't even provide any evidence of correlation, let alone causation. I have generally been skeptic of increases in higher education- but this doesn't really explain the pros and cons of an MBA.