Should this be a cause to correct affected papers? If not corrected, maybe even retract? I understand that there is still clear value in these papers (defining

Should this be a cause to correct affected papers? If not corrected, maybe even retract? I understand that there is still clear value in these papers (defining search space, achieving state of the art). But it does seem, there is some partially broken science there (not evaluating against baselines, algorithm that performs same as a random baseline).