I don't even disagree from a purist standpoint. And yes, I think everyone should read it. But they won't all, and don't need to, understand it. But um, so a so

I don't even disagree from a purist standpoint. And yes, I think everyone should read it. But they won't all, and don't need to, understand it. But um, so a sophomoric summary without the "complications" of proving it is NOT better nor more accessible. And I see none of your bullet points are improved upon in the linked paper.