At least one Justice gets it. The original judge shouldn't have issued the second warrant. First of all, what law was broken by remove the legally placed device

At least one Justice gets it. The original judge shouldn't have issued the second warrant. First of all, what law was broken by remove the legally placed device? (The fact that it is different than a consumer device sounds be immaterial) second, isn't possession 9/10s the law? It is on his car, he should have a right to remove it. I would also be concerned with the police planning an active device on the car. This will definitely set a dangerous precedent.