3 ms·
You misread the spec: > Since all code in Enterprise™ goes in the disruptive class, any other class you declare, although syntactically correct, is strictly un
by outworlder 7y ago
You misread the spec:
> Since all code in Enterprise™ goes in the disruptive class, any other class you declare, although syntactically correct, is strictly unnecessary.
It's only unnecessary if it is not disruptive.
- mamcx 7y agoBut that is not a feature of the Startup language? Why it wish to clone that? A proper Enterprise™ must have instead "CeoAproved" classes instead..