3 ms·
Well, I could be reasonably sure that it was, at least before I learned today that there were other init systems that also displayed their output like that. So,
by jolmg 7y ago
Well, I could be reasonably sure that it was, at least before I learned today that there were other init systems that also displayed their output like that. So, the statement:
> the green [ OK ], is what many people already identify systemd with
is true for people like me that were not familiar with those other systems.
For example, most probably use Ubuntu (and probably only Ubuntu), and as far as I know it didn't display those [ OK ] until after it adopted systemd. So, at least there's a very large portion of users that never saw those [ OK ] until systemd came along.
If I remember right, it was the same case with Archlinux, which is where I was first exposed to systemd.
Imagine, the biggest news in your distro is the migration to systemd and the first and most obvious change you notice is that the boot process has all these neat [ OK ]s instead of random text. I think it's to be expected that people would identify systemd with that.
- baked_ziti 7y agoI guess you're right, your experience is universal. SystemD really IS where that comes from.
- jolmg 7y agoWhat do you mean? I thought we all agreed that it wasn't.