4 ms·
Yeah though grammatical constructs are IMO breaking the rules and their frequency of use would probably be added to the dictionary as compounds, iama, youarea,
by yabadabadoes 7y ago
Yeah though grammatical constructs are IMO breaking the rules and their frequency of use would probably be added to the dictionary as compounds, iama, youarea, thereis, .. are all more practical in a cracking dictionary than a few more 18th century salon talk words, etc.
- ehmish 7y agoWhat's more difficult to add to the dictionary before hand are things more like "samisacorrecthorsebatterystaple". Once you add in proper nouns, the practicality of pre-loading compounds doesn't work as well, since there's so many proper nouns. Plus proper nouns are often more memorable because they have meaning to the person who wrote the password.
- yabadabadoes 7y agoIf I were building a dictionary I would simply do an analysis with no punctuation of media to get frequent compound strands, brands, names, etc.. Common names, etc would IMO be very frequent compared to a foreign loan word, like samovar. So once the rules are lax for password choice, the crack patterns are again julieisborninjuly or what not and the weak users are back in a very small search space.