3 ms·
Does this do away with Network Manager, or do they somehow play nicely together. Part of the reason why I've begun to dislike Linux is that things like network
by hiram112 7y ago
Does this do away with Network Manager, or do they somehow play nicely together.
Part of the reason why I've begun to dislike Linux is that things like networking used to be completely defined in config files, operated on by known commands.
Now it just seems like a hodgepodge of a dozen different daemons and applications writing over files, I honestly can't keep track of which is the authoritative config or app for interfaces, DNS, wifi, etc.
- eikenberry 7y agoIt can do away with NetworkManager or it can work with it. The integration with NM wasn't quite there in time for Debian Buster (which I use) but it was close and might be there now. They were working on it. I have never used NetworkManager so can't comment intelligently on it. But I have it setup without it and it requires just a few config files. How many/how much config depends on how much you want to tweak things and how you want to organize things. The main thing missing in the current stack is a nice interface for wifi. Using iwd for wifi has made things much better and if you don't mind CLI management it is quite nice. For a bit more concrete of an example here is a gist I through up a while back describing replacing the old setup with a systemd based one. https://gist.github.com/eikenb/1e9faeb8210e639e8caa69e9832db594 https://gist.github.com/eikenb/1e9faeb8210e639e8caa69e9832db...