I’m pretty neutral. Why does he deserve it less than the billionaire VCs who didn’t do due diligence before handing it over? I don’t see moral superiority on ei

I’m pretty neutral. Why does he deserve it less than the billionaire VCs who didn’t do due diligence before handing it over? I don’t see moral superiority on either side of the table from where I’m standing. Besides by that principle his employees didn’t deserve to get paid either, since by your reasoning his employees were only paid by the fruits of fraud. That doesn’t make sense to me.