> Thanks for the smug talking down to. :) Absolutely. There's a lot of people who don't understand how science works outside of a parochial impression from phy

> Thanks for the smug talking down to. :) Absolutely. There's a lot of people who don't understand how science works outside of a parochial impression from physics, and if I can't get some pleasure from dealing with it, then why bother? > We don't have a second one to use as a control. Like all observational sciences, basically. > In any case, your analogy is actually very poor. You can check and be 100% sure if a gun is loaded. All analogies can be strained out of usefulness. > You can't check what will happen to the climate in 50 years because it hasn't happened We already did. We're fifty years in and seeing the effects.