Understood. However reading this just made it click for me that PGs essays and talks about the future of angel investing have a stealth result of signalling to

Understood. However reading this just made it click for me that PGs essays and talks about the future of angel investing have a stealth result of signalling to VCs how they should approach and deal with YC companies. Seems obvious in retrospect. It could certainly be unintended, but if I was a VC reading PGs thoughts on where the angel ecosystem is going, I'd take it as a definite signal to meet him on the hill he claims to be walking toward.