6 ms·
Very cool, a sort of live-action cgi capability. Hope it doesn't easily scale out to larger spaces and crowds, or the current tech industry would soon have pub
by SiempreViernes 7y ago
Very cool, a sort of live-action cgi capability.
Hope it doesn't easily scale out to larger spaces and crowds, or the current tech industry would soon have public spaces filled with ads projected on peoples belongings.
- Frost1x 7y agoGoing to start ordering everything coated in vantablack then... https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vantablack https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vantablack
- ryanmcbride 7y agoUnless you're Anish Kapoor you'll have to settle for Black 3.0 https://www.culturehustleusa.com/products/black-3-0-the-worlds-blackest-black-acrylic-paint-150ml https://www.culturehustleusa.com/products/black-3-0-the-worl...
- panopticon 7y agoPlus, Black 3.0 isn't toxic like Vantablack.
- throwaway744678 7y agoThe target needs to be marked with infrared ink: you can project only on specific surfaces prepared in advance. Edit: discard this comment, I misread the parent comment.
- make3 7y agono? the second link showed that it doesn't have to
- JoshTriplett 7y agoNot according to the comment that started this thread, which suggests that they no longer need the infrared paint.
- FroshKiller 7y agoThe tech industry would soon have some very expensive equipment destroyed.
- drumttocs8 7y agoI doubt it would ever be used on private property like that, but we absolutely will see this tech used in the advertising space.
- deleted 7y ago[deleted]
- aaron695 7y ago> public spaces filled with ads projected on peoples belongings. They literally could have done this for 100+ years. They do not. Do you see how what you say makes no sense other than a fear of technology? You've seen projectors, you've seen how they don't just project them anywhere, it's hard to see how one makes this leap.