6 ms·
> Real estate will always be priced at what buyers in an area can afford per month when factoring in home price, mortgage interest, and taxes This was the mode
by pjmorris 7y ago
> Real estate will always be priced at what buyers in an area can afford per month when factoring in home price, mortgage interest, and taxes
This was the model that led me to believe there were problems in the housing market in ~2005. Well, technically, it was the concrete evidence that this model was being violated. House prices in South Florida, where I lived at the time, tripled in ~5 years, but incomes did not. Robert Shiller had a graph of housing prices normalized to income from 1890-2005 in the NYT in 2005. Price-Income generally stayed flat, with the exception of a bump after WW2, the S&L crisis in the late 80's, and an enormous launch in the early 2000's.
As I see it, current housing prices are being forced out of the traditional model by the effects of the Fed's QE efforts.
- nemo44x 7y ago> As I see it, current housing prices are being forced out of the traditional model by the effects of the Fed's QE efforts. Very likely true. The financial crisis messed everything up. Driving interest rates down and QE stemmed the bleeding but it is only prolonging the pain. Possibly we are in a new normal of low-to-negative interest rates for the extended future. If this is the case, expect homes to continue to rise in value and for people with access to cheap capital to continue to pull away from everyone else. I'm not optimistic interest rates will rise as inflation stays low. They tried raising rates last year and it shook the markets and there just doesn't seem to be a stomach for a prolonged reckoning.
- pjmorris 7y ago> I'm not optimistic interest rates will rise as inflation stays low. I agree that interest rates are likely to stay low. I find it ironic to think of as inflation as low, given that housing is way out of its historical pricing band relative to the model factors.
- nemo44x 7y agoMoney is cheap. Homes in particular rely a lot on financing. Goods that don’t rely on financing are relatively cheap since inflation has been so low. I believe in part because money is so cheap currently that businesses are able to sell bonds cheaply to finance their operation. Because of this the savings are passed down to consumers. But house prices have more to do with interest rates than inflation currently I suspect.
- AnimalMuppet 7y agoI think it's because most people don't decide how much house they can afford based on the purchase price. They decide based on the monthly payment. Obviously, as the interest rate declines, they can buy more for the same monthly payment. Therefore house prices go up, because everyone can pay more for the same monthly payment. I remember when interest rates fell from 9% to 7% (early 90s). We had just bought a house for about $60K. Then interest rates fell, and house prices jumped, and suddenly our house was worth 90K. But if we had bought the same house at 90K at 7%, our monthly payments would have been the same.
- pjmorris 7y agoI agree that monthly payment is the key factor people consider. I think there's more to it than interest rates, though, let me demonstrate: I took a generic mortgage calculator and ran the numbers (30 year mortgage) on your house (first two rows), and on a South Florida townhouse that used to be mine (second two rows), to illustrate: Price Rate Monthly Lifetime 60000 9 483 173798 90000 7 599 215558 142000 7 945 340000 309000 3 1303 468992 Note that the monthly payments are 24-37% higher in their after scenarios, even with a low, low interest rate for my townhouse. I see this scenario playing out over and over again and people assign the difference to interest rates when crunching the numbers suggests there's more to it.