10 ms·

I Do Not See Myself Represented in Essays on Dating

65 points by enkiv2 7y ago

vfsbf 7y ago
From what I read you are a sissy. You've been brainwashed by feminism. Women don't like sissies. And those who do, it's because they like to step on their partners. Women like to be dominated by those they find desirable. Man up and find someone who finds you desirable and they like to be chased. You are not worthless; you will find someone.
awinter-py 7y ago
His point about the missing middle in dating apps is valid feedback about dating apps and all algo-based matching platforms (including news aggregators like this one, although in the case of aggregators it may be desirable). Designing non-WTA systems is really hard One system that gets around it is the matching algorithm for medical residency, which is designed to match every student with a space. But (1) this is probably not appropriate for dating, and (2) professional licensing has its own problems.
- dri_ft 7y ago
  WTA?
  - simulate 7y ago
    WTA probably means winner-takes-all in this context.
  - abstrakraft 7y ago
    Winner Take All
- alextheparrot 7y ago
  To add to and explore the last bit of your comment a bit more, medical residency matching is a generalisation of the stable marriage problem — stable means that between two groups no two pairs can be broken apart where the members of the old pairs can form a new pair which is happier (Only one of the new pairs needs to be happier). If I recall correctly, the algorithm can be biased given that it might need to resolve multiple, competing stable solutions, which is an interesting exercise for whoever is trying to use it (I believe the medical one was changed to favour applicants in recent years). I wonder if there’s a perturbation on the dating app format where the app creates groupings, then invites members to speed-dating style events where rankings can occur (Or just outright pairings if people vibe, but that should be fine because they presumably would be paired later anyway as first choices), and then setup blind second dates with the stable pairs.
goda90 7y ago
>For some people, their expansive social network provides a pool of friends whose friendship can grow into romance; this won’t work for me, since I am too exhausted from my day job & side hustles to maintain hundreds of close friendships. I see this right here as his principle problem. He needs to make time for getting out of the house and doing things with other people. On top of that, he needs to make sure that this social time isn't laser focused on finding a romance, and let interactions with women play out naturally.
- Shaddox 7y ago
  Any tips or advice for this? Preferably tuned for someone who has no friends.
  - kop316 7y ago
    Do you have hobbies? My main two hobbies are music and D&D. I go out and play at open mic nights and have met friends there, and I have also gone to gaming stores to play D&D and made friends there. Since the folks there share a common interest with me, it made it much easier to meet new people and make friends. EDIT: keep in mind, those don't have to be your hobbies. But there are hobbies like that that can allow you to meet new people.
  - agilebyte 7y ago
    This about it this way: what do you do when you are not with other people? Is that something you could do with people and people would want to be part of? If so, you are in a good spot making friends and having relationships.
  - _bxg1 7y ago
    Think through your hobbies that might lend themselves to meetups: tabletop/card gaming? cycling? rock climbing? Beyond that Meetup.com is a wealth of resources. Beyond that, maybe try out new hobbies that are social. Improv, casual sports like kickball (even if like me you aren't particularly into them), hiking groups, etc.
  - peterwoerner 7y ago
vbtemp 7y ago
Sounds like this dude is insufferable and exhausting and probably presents himself as such on his dating profile. Edit: Before you start writing a treatise on the socio-economics of contemporary market-based internet dating in the age of diverstity.. just try the following: 1. Put up a crisp, clear picture of yourself dressed nicely with a smile. Put up a second clear picture of you doing some kind of interesting activity (hiking in the wilderness, doing art, playing with a puppy, etc). 2. Write a self-description that gives off vibes of you being a generally positive person, and relatively charming and perhaps a bit funny. If you can't be charming, you can at least be polite. If you're not funny, you can at least be lighthearted.
- fortran77 7y ago
  I agree. He is the one without self-awareness. Did he ever consider that he may not be fun to be around? He seems to think he's somehow better than other people, more "self-aware" as he puts it, but maybe he's just not aware of the social skills needed to seem attractive to other people. I hope he realizes what he needs to do before it's too late. Other, more successful, men may just be _better_ than he is. It's not some vast unfairness, it's just that there are things this man needs to work on and get better at.
- generalpass 7y ago
  > Sounds like this dude is insufferable and exhausting and probably presents himself as such on his dating profile. In my experience, people making these kinds of statements often haven't any sense of humility, compassion or empathy, so it is likely you cannot understand even why he would make his post. Further, this same personality trait also seems lead to online ridicule of people trying to share their experiences online. > Edit: Before you start writing a treatise on the socio-economics of contemporary market-based internet dating in the age of diverstity.. just try the following: 1. Put up a crisp, clear picture of yourself dressed nicely with a smile. Put up a second clear picture of you doing some kind of interesting activity (hiking in the wilderness, doing art, playing with a puppy, etc). 2. Write a self-description that gives off vibes of you being a generally positive person, and relatively charming and perhaps a bit funny. If you can't be charming, you can at least be polite. If you're not funny, you can at least be lighthearted. Edit: It is also consistent with this personality trait to assume that your advice is desired, and to then provide that advice.
shusson 7y ago
> It’s soul-crushing to spend every day of your life making bets you know you’re going to lose, but the alternatives are giving up or becoming a monster. I've never used dating apps, but I would assume it attracts a certain type of people, which this author seems to be complaining about. Why not try a sport or hobby to meet people?
- metalliqaz 7y ago
  I dunno 'bout you, but I'm a dude, and sports/hobbies would just be a way for me to meet other dudes. (even assuming I had outgoing social skills) This kind of advice can be so frustrating to receive. Like when other women (often old enough to be my mother) suggest meeting females at the supermarket. Like, what? Nobody wants to be bothered while they are grocery shopping. This could only work for the top 1% of extremely attractive guys. The "just meet people" or "just talk to her" narrative doesn't work in modern life. Everyone is walking around with headphones on and their noses pointing at a screen. Nobody wants to talk to you. Especially in a romantic context. On dating apps, there is an implicit romantic intention, so at least a guy is free to flirt and hit on girls in that context. In other contexts, he has to worry about attention being interpreted as harassment, on top of the risk of rejection.
  - everdrive 7y ago
    > Nobody wants to be bothered while they are grocery shopping. They do if they find the guy attractive, though. The trick is you don't get to know beforehand. You have to take the risk, and the rewards, or (more often) the failure.
  - base698 7y ago
    At times as a 20 year old I would try the bars and parties approach and had limited success. In my hobbies, also male dominated (75/25) M/F ratio I'd easily find girlfriends. I always felt when I was younger that I should be able to meet people "normally" without that as a crutch. Alas, I'm about 10 years married, from someone I met in my hobbies. Most male dominated things have participants and/or groupies--even something obscure. If your hobbies have zero women, maybe find another one or focus more on one that has something.
TOGoS 7y ago
I spent years having an overall pretty bad dating experience very similar to the author's. But there is one thing I eventually learned that seemed to help. > if I don’t get an extremely clear indication of interest, I try not to show any myself. If you're a weirdo like myself who has no idea how to flirt, your best bet may be to simply be as open as you can about your feelings. People generally like openness, and they like it when people like them. I've told friends that I was in love with them, and in cases where the feelings weren't mutual they let me know, and I dropped it. I'm married to the one where they did turn out to be mutual. :P
kop316 7y ago
From reading this, I wonder if there is a business case for a "faux" dating business. Before a date, you could get certain opinions on how you look, how you present yourself, etc. And you could go on some sort of outing with someone, and at the end, you get feedback on what you did well and what you didn't do well. This would also give you an opportunity to "practice" your date skills (for lack of a better term). Also, being blunt, with dating apps, it really is all about physical attraction first. If who you are trying to court isn't physically attracted to your pictures (or think you're trying to hide something), they simply won't interact with you.
- Miner49er 7y ago
  > From reading this, I wonder if there is a business case for a "faux" dating business. Idk, I think this type of thinking is a major part of the problem. We're turning everything we can into a profit seeking venture. Even dating itself has been commodified. We no longer form relationships by talking to the people around us. Instead, we stare at our phones and swipe left or right. Someone is able to make a profit that way. From the article: "For some people, their expansive social network provides a pool of friends whose friendship can grow into romance; this won’t work for me, since I am too exhausted from my day job & side hustles to maintain hundreds of close friendships." It seems we need to set aside more time as a society for things like social activities and forming relationships instead of being productive or generating someone money.
  - kop316 7y ago
    That's fair. I hear this and am thinking that it sounds that the author needs to have someone to give him an honest opinion on why he hasn't been dating. And I wonder, what would be the best way for that?
    - Miner49er 7y ago
      I think as a business idea it's a good idea. There would actually probably be a market for it. And that's the problem. Instead of having time to make friends who can give us dating advice, we instead spend our time making money, then paying a business to give us dating advice. Then we turn to another business to introduce us to potential romantic partners. Almost everything that we do these days is making someone money, which is great for the economy, but not so much for happiness. A business can't replace actual friends and an actual community in a truly fulfilling way.
_bxg1 7y ago
> I’m no catch, but there are probably a half dozen people I know who I would date & who would date me if communication opened up. (I know this empirically: there was a short period in college where I hit on everyone, and while I stopped because I realized I was probably making a lot of people uncomfortable, I ended up having a casual thing going with about ten young women simultaneously — and this was back when I was broke, out of shape, and the special kind of dumb that only college students can afford to be.) It sounds, friend, like you have a misguided (outsized) sense of nobility. You aren't wrong about what women put up with in our society, but you also can't write off any initiative by you at all as dangerous. Your own anecdote shows that when you put yourself out there, plenty of people have interest in you and don't feel the need to run for the hills. It's admirable how hard you're trying not to be a part of the problem, but don't make yourself a martyr. After a certain point, it isn't helping anybody. I'm sure striking the right balance is much more difficult for someone who has trouble picking up on social cues, but it's just a matter of trying it out and learning the curve. Maybe you could practice with or ask advice from women you know platonically? You said you're friends with most of your exes- maybe they can give you insight into how you came off in those relationships? It's a big and complicated world out there. It's good to try and be sensitive to others, but you can't let yourself get totally buried by worry about how you'll affect them. You just have to do your best, and then apologize if you mess up. And that's okay. You have it in you to grow past this and find a companion. Everyone deserves to be loved. Best of luck.
- mewpmewp2 7y ago
  It is as simple as you ask a woman out who you are interested in. If she ignores you or says no, you move on. If she keeps saying yes to your date invitations it means she likes you. Avoiding or being scared of making the first move is very unattractive and shows extreme lack of confidence and confidence is the most attractive trait.
  - throwlaplace 7y ago
    >It is as simple as you ask a woman out who you are interested in No it's not that simple. Some women are propositioned so often that it becomes a trial just to be out. Time and place are important too.
catacombs 7y ago
A cringey read.
moretai 7y ago
What about people who don't want to have friends? I have had "friends", people I considered my brother. A person I loved. But in due time, it all feels like they were using me. That I was just a toy for them to pass the time. Someone they could exert their demons out without judgement. Be the space that no one else would give them. I had boat loads of fun, but I never really felt cared for ever. The only people who ever cared for me where my parents.
- mewpmewp2 7y ago
  You either change your mindset or stay alone forever. There is no other option. Unless you are a suave lone wolf in which case you could also be fine, but it seems like you are focused on the negative things that happened to you while you should really be improving yourself.
- armitron 7y ago
  Welcome to America.
homonculus1 7y ago
The hacker ethos is "It doesn't matter whether the subject is popular, everybody who's interested is interesting". But the dating ethos is "Men with badly-groomed beards who write harem anime reviews don't get dates". There's just no way around it, that's the problem here. Having a house and job are attractive characteristics, in the same sense that a functioning set of limbs is, but they don't set you apart. It's the personal details that matter.
- jjdredd 7y ago
  IMO owning a house in early thirties is pretty good. It should also be attractive for those people who want to start a family.
  - homonculus1 7y ago
    It's really good actually but it's not a differentiating factor at the dating stage. Dating is an emotional competition, marriage introduces practical considerations. You need to get past the likeability filter before any woman is even asking herself whether she'd settle down with you. If you present yourself as marriage material without succeeding at being dating material, you're selecting for economic opportunists ("gold-diggers").
- User23 7y ago
  You can't fight a million years of evolution. Hypergamy[1] is a real thing. As you observe, the author of the piece strongly signals low social status and confirms it by declaring his lack of mating success. Fortunately for him, and others in his predicament, there are ways to signal higher social status and thus increase mating success[2]. Human behavior is far more complex than animal behavior, but pragmatically we should still understand a behavior such as going to medical school and becoming a doctor to be, in addition to its other purposes, an observably effective status increasing display. When it comes to mate preferences and thus what kind of display behaviors will be successful, always look at revealed preference and always ignore stated preference, as the latter is observably less accurate and matches revealed preference when it is. As this can be an emotionally sensitive subject I'll not offer examples, but many will readily come to mind on some consideration. [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hypergamy https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hypergamy [2] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Display_(zoology) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Display_(zoology)
mewpmewp2 7y ago
It seems like a victim complex to me. If his mindset is like that no wonder he is not getting any.
Mathnerd314 7y ago
It's old but there's a list of bars etc. here, if Tinder etc. are that bad: https://www.connecticutmag.com/the-connecticut-story/the-savvy-singles-guide-to-connecticut/article_be536921-6669-5ec4-a6ad-1d830e4664e4.html https://www.connecticutmag.com/the-connecticut-story/the-sav...
orthoxerox 7y ago
Women call people like him "nice guys", and that's not a compliment.
- Pfhreak 7y ago
  This meme needs to die.
projectramo 7y ago
Not that I am an expert, but like (I assume) most people I put in my time in the dating mines. And this is my observation about people who have this complaint: the vast majority of couples are aesthetically matched. You might be hoping for a certain aesthetic. You have to match that. The easiest way to do this is to start eating healthy and working out. By working out, I don't mean an occasional job, but the heavy stuff: lifting, crossfit etc. It goes without saying you should not injure yourself. This small "trick" -- working out -- will have a dramatic effect on your dating life.
throwlaplace 7y ago
I read most of the post (unlike others in here) and his issue is distinct from that of many others on dating apps (or at least it is according to his self-reported behavior). it is probably not relatable to most here (because he's bending over backwards to be egalitarian and most on here lean the other way) so I'll just respond in case he ends up reading this. I share many of your concerns and sensitivities around feminism and autonomy. despite being arguably just as sensitive as you are (according to feedback from former partners) I do well on apps and in dating. how? I'm assertive and aggressive but I get explicit consent at every escalation. And if you think I'm exaggerating I am not. Evey escalation. now obviously I'm not tactless - I do not have multi form contracts that I ask for signatures on. I simply check in and we have a short, always interesting, conversation about boundaries and trajectory and all that. most of the time everything goes as expected but I have been rejected (which is also how I'm sure the way I'm doing it is working - because when feel free to say no). it works very well. I have deep meaningful dates (that turn into relationships often). aside from that I'll say, from the photos of you online, you're not doing yourself any favors. I think I could help you but I don't know you personally. I have toyed with the idea of starting a consulting service that taught men how to present themselves such that they're attractive.
stanfordkid 7y ago
Seems like he lacks basic social skills and expects women to date him because he owns his own house. He feels guilty and "like a monster" hitting on or asking women out because of this thought process. He himself said he had been successful in the past -- why not continue that and make yourself happy?
- generalpass 7y ago
  > Seems like he lacks basic social skills and expects women to date him because he owns his own house. He feels guilty and "like a monster" hitting on women because of this un-empathetic, objectifying, and entitled thought process. What if his brief statement about financial stability is to deal with claims that he needs to first take care of himself because women aren't interested in highly unstable men who can't take care of themselves? What if, no matter what he states, people immediately jump to conclusions which require assumptions with no evidence and include quotes that he didn't make?
lgeorget 7y ago
Maybe he should try speed dating. In that kind of context, it's easy to start a conversation and not awkward to show interest in someone. And it's more personal than getting to know someone through an app. But maybe it doesn't attract to kind of people he'd be interested in.
MayeulC 7y ago
What would be the optimal way of finding partners, or simply people you would like to spend time with, among 7+ billion people? Here's my answer* : train an A.I to "flirt"/"have conversations" with others A.I. Use reinforcement learning to tailor the A.I. to specific users. Nice, everyone now has their own personal I.A. that can go on dates with other personal A.I. Thousands of them per second, if needs be. If the system works well enough that A.I.s "get along" as well as their human models would (/would not), you have found a very nice way to perform a "double blind" matching platform. Feed back the results after you go on a real date! "A.I." here could be anywhere on the spectrum of a simple regexp, to neural networks, to AGI. Of course, in my experience, shared experience is a big part of what makes relationships (non romantic, and prob. otherwise), while previous experiences or interests are a way to discover things to do together (or recall shared experiences), so this can't replace getting out and sharing activities. * TBH, that's just shower thoughts, but could turn into a fun research/week-end/startup/fediverse project (or just a writing prompt for a novel). Edit: split this post in two different ones.
- MayeulC 7y ago
  Yes, I could use some dating advice as well. But I find this post a bit self-pitying. Even if I find some of myself in the words expressed by the author, it is unreasonable to always ask the other party to do the first move. For now, I sort of stopped caring, and see flirting as a social sports of sorts (hone my social skills). Lots of missed opportunities (I generally don't know how to behave if things start going too well), lots of fun and new friends as well :) Edit: I sort of realize that I am catching up with the social interaction I didn't have at (high) school (too young, different countries, different interests such as tech stuff). Other people generally do the opposite and catch up on the skill side later. Either way, I'm still learning, as always.
xwowsersx 7y ago
I think the problems may be that 1) he blames the patriarchy 2) he doesn't see himself as a catch I know men are in a difficult position because they want to err on the side of caution and not make a move when it could be seen as a violation/unwanted, but these attitudes (blaming the patriarchy, etc) are projected to the would-be partner and it's probably a turn-off. Find someone you can build trust with where every interaction between the two of you isn't interpreted through some larger cultural lens.
Semaphor 7y ago
I found OkCupid (where I met my now-wife) extremely easy to get to know people. Tons of filters and search options, the most amazing matching algorithm of any site (you answer questions from "Don’t agree at all" to "Agree 100%", then you can say what you want your match to answer and finally how important their answer matching is; this enables way more than more naive sites). You can mark-up any word on your profile as a keyword. And people reply. Back then I was pretty overweight but almost every woman I messaged replied, including those with the scary "rarely replies" badge. The few times I asked they said it’s because most men who write them either just said "Hi", "Great tits", or showed they didn’t actually read their profile first. But this was all several years ago, so maybe things got worse. I know nowadays the push to pay them is a lot more heavy-handed and OkStats is gone.
- eloisius 7y ago
  Okc has gone to speed swiping format like everyone else. You can only message someone you match with now, which is unfortunate because you used to be able to demonstrate some kind of attractiveness other than initial appearances. I get that women have a problem filtering the deluge of low-quality messages otherwise, but I wonder if there isn’t a better way to meter the problem than mutual swiping.
deogeo 7y ago
> in western society (and in some eastern ones too), women who directly reject men are subject to male rage & women who seem too enthusiastic are subject to slut-shaming (which can also result in violence). Perhaps he would have more luck dating in a less patriarchal society, with higher gender equality?
mcv 7y ago
I was like that. Actually, I'm worse. I never got laid before I was 32. I've always been very respectful of boundaries, didn't want to impose, and due to social awkwardness, that meant I had a hard time approaching women. And to be honest, I don't really have an easy solution; in the end I met my wife and we've been happily married for 12 years now. For a while I did give up. Particularly in university, I wasn't very interested in the dating game. I did have the occasional crush, didn't know how to act on it, and when I did, it generally amounted to nothing. After 30, I decided to try this online dating, went on lots of dates, most of them amounted to nothing, then I met a woman I fell madly in love with, and she apparently with me, but we soon realised it wasn't going to work: she smoked, I hated smoking. I wanted children, she didn't. We broke up, and I soon met my wife on that same site. And I believe she was the one to contact me first, which definitely helps. That site that got me two hits in a row, wasn't a normal commercial dating site, though. It was really cheap, low threshold, aimed specifically at Christians, and not just at dating, but also at friendship. And it supported blogging. Maybe that lowered the threshold somehow. I don't know. But I've become a strong believer in non-commercial, focused on special interest, dating-but-also-friendship sites. For one thing, commercial dating sites are mostly scams. OKCupid used to love exposing those scams, but I believe they've been bought by the biggest dating scammer, so they're likely as useless as the others now. Ultimately, all you really need, is a way to meet new people with similar interests to yours. Not identical, but it helps to have some common interest, whether it's a hobby, religion, activism, or whatever. It doesn't have to be a dating site, it can be a real-life activity. It can be an online game (I know a couple that met on World of Warcraft). Make sure you can talk about something other than dating. See if you can talk to them about other stuff than dating. If it turns out you can talk to each other, ask her out for a coffee or some other small thing. Or maybe do something hobby related together, see how that works out. I suppose you've got to become more confident at making the first move if you don't want to be totally dependent on the whims of the other, but the move doesn't have to be aimed straight at dating. Though to be honest, I don't know how much my advice is worth. People like me never get a lot of dating experience; once we find the right person, we stick with them.
- archagon 7y ago
  Out of curiosity, what was the site?
harimau777 7y ago
Not directly related, but the biggest obstacle that I find I face is that people who share my religious background tend to be more conservative while, in terms of lifestyle and worldview, I tend to be more progressive. I find that the women who I am interested in rarely share my faith while the women who share my faith rarely share any of my interests.
whateverthisis 7y ago
Online dating has many problems, but not all failures to obtain a positive outcome from online dating are the fault of the system. It is easy to blame the system and more difficult to accept that the system is not at fault in some situations. You can't simultaneously reject the current societal dating standards but also expect that a system based on those same standards will work for you. Given this, might it make more sense to find a method of dating that is more in line with the societal standards that you seek to live by?
mcnamaratw 7y ago
There's a traditional low-tech solution to this problem, used by generations of nerds. Step 1, hang out in real life with a bunch of guys. Have fun with them. (If you're really sucked into your work, this step could take a while.) Step 2 is that women will appear and you will date them.
klyrs 7y ago
Opinionated advice, ymmv. Get off dating apps; they're toxic. Use Meetup, take a pottery class, a yoga class, join a hiking group, a book club. And crucially, don't expect any of that to yield a romantic partnership. Make friends. Go to their weddings, parties, etc. There, you might meet women who are looking for a guy like you. Or maybe one of your friendships will blossom into more. When I was single and presenting as male, I found myself in a similar conundrum. I found success in "playing hard to get," eg., rather than immediately biting at every flirt, I'd respond with low-key flirts and not escalate for some time. After I got enough consistent-seeming signs, I'd ask somebody out long before I got attached to the idea. "Hey, you wanna get lunch some time?" "Uh, do you mean a date? I've got a partner." "Oh, haha, yeah I meant a date, no worries." When you can do that without feeling devastated, you're on the right track.
- deleted 7y ago
  [deleted]
deleted 7y ago
[deleted]

65 points by enkiv2 7y ago

From what I read you are a sissy. You've been brainwashed by feminism. Women don't like sissies. And those who do, it's because they like to step on their partners. Women like to be dominated by those they find desirable. Man up and find someone who finds you desirable and they like to be chased. You are not worthless; you will find someone.

awinter-py 7y ago

His point about the missing middle in dating apps is valid feedback about dating apps and all algo-based matching platforms (including news aggregators like this one, although in the case of aggregators it may be desirable). Designing non-WTA systems is really hard One system that gets around it is the matching algorithm for medical residency, which is designed to match every student with a space. But (1) this is probably not appropriate for dating, and (2) professional licensing has its own problems.

dri_ft 7y ago
WTA?
- simulate 7y ago
  WTA probably means winner-takes-all in this context.
- abstrakraft 7y ago
  Winner Take All
alextheparrot 7y ago
To add to and explore the last bit of your comment a bit more, medical residency matching is a generalisation of the stable marriage problem — stable means that between two groups no two pairs can be broken apart where the members of the old pairs can form a new pair which is happier (Only one of the new pairs needs to be happier). If I recall correctly, the algorithm can be biased given that it might need to resolve multiple, competing stable solutions, which is an interesting exercise for whoever is trying to use it (I believe the medical one was changed to favour applicants in recent years). I wonder if there’s a perturbation on the dating app format where the app creates groupings, then invites members to speed-dating style events where rankings can occur (Or just outright pairings if people vibe, but that should be fine because they presumably would be paired later anyway as first choices), and then setup blind second dates with the stable pairs.

goda90 7y ago

>For some people, their expansive social network provides a pool of friends whose friendship can grow into romance; this won’t work for me, since I am too exhausted from my day job & side hustles to maintain hundreds of close friendships. I see this right here as his principle problem. He needs to make time for getting out of the house and doing things with other people. On top of that, he needs to make sure that this social time isn't laser focused on finding a romance, and let interactions with women play out naturally.

Shaddox 7y ago
Any tips or advice for this? Preferably tuned for someone who has no friends.
- kop316 7y ago
  Do you have hobbies? My main two hobbies are music and D&D. I go out and play at open mic nights and have met friends there, and I have also gone to gaming stores to play D&D and made friends there. Since the folks there share a common interest with me, it made it much easier to meet new people and make friends. EDIT: keep in mind, those don't have to be your hobbies. But there are hobbies like that that can allow you to meet new people.
- agilebyte 7y ago
  This about it this way: what do you do when you are not with other people? Is that something you could do with people and people would want to be part of? If so, you are in a good spot making friends and having relationships.
- _bxg1 7y ago
  Think through your hobbies that might lend themselves to meetups: tabletop/card gaming? cycling? rock climbing? Beyond that Meetup.com is a wealth of resources. Beyond that, maybe try out new hobbies that are social. Improv, casual sports like kickball (even if like me you aren't particularly into them), hiking groups, etc.
- peterwoerner 7y ago

vbtemp 7y ago

Sounds like this dude is insufferable and exhausting and probably presents himself as such on his dating profile. Edit: Before you start writing a treatise on the socio-economics of contemporary market-based internet dating in the age of diverstity.. just try the following: 1. Put up a crisp, clear picture of yourself dressed nicely with a smile. Put up a second clear picture of you doing some kind of interesting activity (hiking in the wilderness, doing art, playing with a puppy, etc). 2. Write a self-description that gives off vibes of you being a generally positive person, and relatively charming and perhaps a bit funny. If you can't be charming, you can at least be polite. If you're not funny, you can at least be lighthearted.

fortran77 7y ago
I agree. He is the one without self-awareness. Did he ever consider that he may not be fun to be around? He seems to think he's somehow better than other people, more "self-aware" as he puts it, but maybe he's just not aware of the social skills needed to seem attractive to other people. I hope he realizes what he needs to do before it's too late. Other, more successful, men may just be _better_ than he is. It's not some vast unfairness, it's just that there are things this man needs to work on and get better at.
generalpass 7y ago
> Sounds like this dude is insufferable and exhausting and probably presents himself as such on his dating profile. In my experience, people making these kinds of statements often haven't any sense of humility, compassion or empathy, so it is likely you cannot understand even why he would make his post. Further, this same personality trait also seems lead to online ridicule of people trying to share their experiences online. > Edit: Before you start writing a treatise on the socio-economics of contemporary market-based internet dating in the age of diverstity.. just try the following: 1. Put up a crisp, clear picture of yourself dressed nicely with a smile. Put up a second clear picture of you doing some kind of interesting activity (hiking in the wilderness, doing art, playing with a puppy, etc). 2. Write a self-description that gives off vibes of you being a generally positive person, and relatively charming and perhaps a bit funny. If you can't be charming, you can at least be polite. If you're not funny, you can at least be lighthearted. Edit: It is also consistent with this personality trait to assume that your advice is desired, and to then provide that advice.

shusson 7y ago

> It’s soul-crushing to spend every day of your life making bets you know you’re going to lose, but the alternatives are giving up or becoming a monster. I've never used dating apps, but I would assume it attracts a certain type of people, which this author seems to be complaining about. Why not try a sport or hobby to meet people?

metalliqaz 7y ago
I dunno 'bout you, but I'm a dude, and sports/hobbies would just be a way for me to meet other dudes. (even assuming I had outgoing social skills) This kind of advice can be so frustrating to receive. Like when other women (often old enough to be my mother) suggest meeting females at the supermarket. Like, what? Nobody wants to be bothered while they are grocery shopping. This could only work for the top 1% of extremely attractive guys. The "just meet people" or "just talk to her" narrative doesn't work in modern life. Everyone is walking around with headphones on and their noses pointing at a screen. Nobody wants to talk to you. Especially in a romantic context. On dating apps, there is an implicit romantic intention, so at least a guy is free to flirt and hit on girls in that context. In other contexts, he has to worry about attention being interpreted as harassment, on top of the risk of rejection.
- everdrive 7y ago
  > Nobody wants to be bothered while they are grocery shopping. They do if they find the guy attractive, though. The trick is you don't get to know beforehand. You have to take the risk, and the rewards, or (more often) the failure.
- base698 7y ago
  At times as a 20 year old I would try the bars and parties approach and had limited success. In my hobbies, also male dominated (75/25) M/F ratio I'd easily find girlfriends. I always felt when I was younger that I should be able to meet people "normally" without that as a crutch. Alas, I'm about 10 years married, from someone I met in my hobbies. Most male dominated things have participants and/or groupies--even something obscure. If your hobbies have zero women, maybe find another one or focus more on one that has something.

TOGoS 7y ago

I spent years having an overall pretty bad dating experience very similar to the author's. But there is one thing I eventually learned that seemed to help. > if I don’t get an extremely clear indication of interest, I try not to show any myself. If you're a weirdo like myself who has no idea how to flirt, your best bet may be to simply be as open as you can about your feelings. People generally like openness, and they like it when people like them. I've told friends that I was in love with them, and in cases where the feelings weren't mutual they let me know, and I dropped it. I'm married to the one where they did turn out to be mutual. :P

kop316 7y ago

From reading this, I wonder if there is a business case for a "faux" dating business. Before a date, you could get certain opinions on how you look, how you present yourself, etc. And you could go on some sort of outing with someone, and at the end, you get feedback on what you did well and what you didn't do well. This would also give you an opportunity to "practice" your date skills (for lack of a better term). Also, being blunt, with dating apps, it really is all about physical attraction first. If who you are trying to court isn't physically attracted to your pictures (or think you're trying to hide something), they simply won't interact with you.

Miner49er 7y ago
> From reading this, I wonder if there is a business case for a "faux" dating business. Idk, I think this type of thinking is a major part of the problem. We're turning everything we can into a profit seeking venture. Even dating itself has been commodified. We no longer form relationships by talking to the people around us. Instead, we stare at our phones and swipe left or right. Someone is able to make a profit that way. From the article: "For some people, their expansive social network provides a pool of friends whose friendship can grow into romance; this won’t work for me, since I am too exhausted from my day job & side hustles to maintain hundreds of close friendships." It seems we need to set aside more time as a society for things like social activities and forming relationships instead of being productive or generating someone money.
- kop316 7y ago
  That's fair. I hear this and am thinking that it sounds that the author needs to have someone to give him an honest opinion on why he hasn't been dating. And I wonder, what would be the best way for that?
  - Miner49er 7y ago
    I think as a business idea it's a good idea. There would actually probably be a market for it. And that's the problem. Instead of having time to make friends who can give us dating advice, we instead spend our time making money, then paying a business to give us dating advice. Then we turn to another business to introduce us to potential romantic partners. Almost everything that we do these days is making someone money, which is great for the economy, but not so much for happiness. A business can't replace actual friends and an actual community in a truly fulfilling way.

_bxg1 7y ago

> I’m no catch, but there are probably a half dozen people I know who I would date & who would date me if communication opened up. (I know this empirically: there was a short period in college where I hit on everyone, and while I stopped because I realized I was probably making a lot of people uncomfortable, I ended up having a casual thing going with about ten young women simultaneously — and this was back when I was broke, out of shape, and the special kind of dumb that only college students can afford to be.) It sounds, friend, like you have a misguided (outsized) sense of nobility. You aren't wrong about what women put up with in our society, but you also can't write off any initiative by you at all as dangerous. Your own anecdote shows that when you put yourself out there, plenty of people have interest in you and don't feel the need to run for the hills. It's admirable how hard you're trying not to be a part of the problem, but don't make yourself a martyr. After a certain point, it isn't helping anybody. I'm sure striking the right balance is much more difficult for someone who has trouble picking up on social cues, but it's just a matter of trying it out and learning the curve. Maybe you could practice with or ask advice from women you know platonically? You said you're friends with most of your exes- maybe they can give you insight into how you came off in those relationships? It's a big and complicated world out there. It's good to try and be sensitive to others, but you can't let yourself get totally buried by worry about how you'll affect them. You just have to do your best, and then apologize if you mess up. And that's okay. You have it in you to grow past this and find a companion. Everyone deserves to be loved. Best of luck.

mewpmewp2 7y ago
It is as simple as you ask a woman out who you are interested in. If she ignores you or says no, you move on. If she keeps saying yes to your date invitations it means she likes you. Avoiding or being scared of making the first move is very unattractive and shows extreme lack of confidence and confidence is the most attractive trait.
- throwlaplace 7y ago
  >It is as simple as you ask a woman out who you are interested in No it's not that simple. Some women are propositioned so often that it becomes a trial just to be out. Time and place are important too.

catacombs 7y ago

A cringey read.

moretai 7y ago

What about people who don't want to have friends? I have had "friends", people I considered my brother. A person I loved. But in due time, it all feels like they were using me. That I was just a toy for them to pass the time. Someone they could exert their demons out without judgement. Be the space that no one else would give them. I had boat loads of fun, but I never really felt cared for ever. The only people who ever cared for me where my parents.

mewpmewp2 7y ago
You either change your mindset or stay alone forever. There is no other option. Unless you are a suave lone wolf in which case you could also be fine, but it seems like you are focused on the negative things that happened to you while you should really be improving yourself.
armitron 7y ago
Welcome to America.

homonculus1 7y ago

The hacker ethos is "It doesn't matter whether the subject is popular, everybody who's interested is interesting". But the dating ethos is "Men with badly-groomed beards who write harem anime reviews don't get dates". There's just no way around it, that's the problem here. Having a house and job are attractive characteristics, in the same sense that a functioning set of limbs is, but they don't set you apart. It's the personal details that matter.

jjdredd 7y ago
IMO owning a house in early thirties is pretty good. It should also be attractive for those people who want to start a family.
- homonculus1 7y ago
  It's really good actually but it's not a differentiating factor at the dating stage. Dating is an emotional competition, marriage introduces practical considerations. You need to get past the likeability filter before any woman is even asking herself whether she'd settle down with you. If you present yourself as marriage material without succeeding at being dating material, you're selecting for economic opportunists ("gold-diggers").
User23 7y ago
You can't fight a million years of evolution. Hypergamy[1] is a real thing. As you observe, the author of the piece strongly signals low social status and confirms it by declaring his lack of mating success. Fortunately for him, and others in his predicament, there are ways to signal higher social status and thus increase mating success[2]. Human behavior is far more complex than animal behavior, but pragmatically we should still understand a behavior such as going to medical school and becoming a doctor to be, in addition to its other purposes, an observably effective status increasing display. When it comes to mate preferences and thus what kind of display behaviors will be successful, always look at revealed preference and always ignore stated preference, as the latter is observably less accurate and matches revealed preference when it is. As this can be an emotionally sensitive subject I'll not offer examples, but many will readily come to mind on some consideration. [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hypergamy https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hypergamy [2] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Display_(zoology) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Display_(zoology)

mewpmewp2 7y ago

It seems like a victim complex to me. If his mindset is like that no wonder he is not getting any.

Mathnerd314 7y ago

It's old but there's a list of bars etc. here, if Tinder etc. are that bad: https://www.connecticutmag.com/the-connecticut-story/the-savvy-singles-guide-to-connecticut/article_be536921-6669-5ec4-a6ad-1d830e4664e4.html https://www.connecticutmag.com/the-connecticut-story/the-sav...

orthoxerox 7y ago

Women call people like him "nice guys", and that's not a compliment.

Pfhreak 7y ago
This meme needs to die.

projectramo 7y ago

Not that I am an expert, but like (I assume) most people I put in my time in the dating mines. And this is my observation about people who have this complaint: the vast majority of couples are aesthetically matched. You might be hoping for a certain aesthetic. You have to match that. The easiest way to do this is to start eating healthy and working out. By working out, I don't mean an occasional job, but the heavy stuff: lifting, crossfit etc. It goes without saying you should not injure yourself. This small "trick" -- working out -- will have a dramatic effect on your dating life.

throwlaplace 7y ago

I read most of the post (unlike others in here) and his issue is distinct from that of many others on dating apps (or at least it is according to his self-reported behavior). it is probably not relatable to most here (because he's bending over backwards to be egalitarian and most on here lean the other way) so I'll just respond in case he ends up reading this. I share many of your concerns and sensitivities around feminism and autonomy. despite being arguably just as sensitive as you are (according to feedback from former partners) I do well on apps and in dating. how? I'm assertive and aggressive but I get explicit consent at every escalation. And if you think I'm exaggerating I am not. Evey escalation. now obviously I'm not tactless - I do not have multi form contracts that I ask for signatures on. I simply check in and we have a short, always interesting, conversation about boundaries and trajectory and all that. most of the time everything goes as expected but I have been rejected (which is also how I'm sure the way I'm doing it is working - because when feel free to say no). it works very well. I have deep meaningful dates (that turn into relationships often). aside from that I'll say, from the photos of you online, you're not doing yourself any favors. I think I could help you but I don't know you personally. I have toyed with the idea of starting a consulting service that taught men how to present themselves such that they're attractive.

stanfordkid 7y ago

Seems like he lacks basic social skills and expects women to date him because he owns his own house. He feels guilty and "like a monster" hitting on or asking women out because of this thought process. He himself said he had been successful in the past -- why not continue that and make yourself happy?

generalpass 7y ago
> Seems like he lacks basic social skills and expects women to date him because he owns his own house. He feels guilty and "like a monster" hitting on women because of this un-empathetic, objectifying, and entitled thought process. What if his brief statement about financial stability is to deal with claims that he needs to first take care of himself because women aren't interested in highly unstable men who can't take care of themselves? What if, no matter what he states, people immediately jump to conclusions which require assumptions with no evidence and include quotes that he didn't make?

lgeorget 7y ago

Maybe he should try speed dating. In that kind of context, it's easy to start a conversation and not awkward to show interest in someone. And it's more personal than getting to know someone through an app. But maybe it doesn't attract to kind of people he'd be interested in.

MayeulC 7y ago

What would be the optimal way of finding partners, or simply people you would like to spend time with, among 7+ billion people? Here's my answer* : train an A.I to "flirt"/"have conversations" with others A.I. Use reinforcement learning to tailor the A.I. to specific users. Nice, everyone now has their own personal I.A. that can go on dates with other personal A.I. Thousands of them per second, if needs be. If the system works well enough that A.I.s "get along" as well as their human models would (/would not), you have found a very nice way to perform a "double blind" matching platform. Feed back the results after you go on a real date! "A.I." here could be anywhere on the spectrum of a simple regexp, to neural networks, to AGI. Of course, in my experience, shared experience is a big part of what makes relationships (non romantic, and prob. otherwise), while previous experiences or interests are a way to discover things to do together (or recall shared experiences), so this can't replace getting out and sharing activities. * TBH, that's just shower thoughts, but could turn into a fun research/week-end/startup/fediverse project (or just a writing prompt for a novel). Edit: split this post in two different ones.

MayeulC 7y ago
Yes, I could use some dating advice as well. But I find this post a bit self-pitying. Even if I find some of myself in the words expressed by the author, it is unreasonable to always ask the other party to do the first move. For now, I sort of stopped caring, and see flirting as a social sports of sorts (hone my social skills). Lots of missed opportunities (I generally don't know how to behave if things start going too well), lots of fun and new friends as well :) Edit: I sort of realize that I am catching up with the social interaction I didn't have at (high) school (too young, different countries, different interests such as tech stuff). Other people generally do the opposite and catch up on the skill side later. Either way, I'm still learning, as always.

xwowsersx 7y ago

I think the problems may be that 1) he blames the patriarchy 2) he doesn't see himself as a catch I know men are in a difficult position because they want to err on the side of caution and not make a move when it could be seen as a violation/unwanted, but these attitudes (blaming the patriarchy, etc) are projected to the would-be partner and it's probably a turn-off. Find someone you can build trust with where every interaction between the two of you isn't interpreted through some larger cultural lens.

Semaphor 7y ago

I found OkCupid (where I met my now-wife) extremely easy to get to know people. Tons of filters and search options, the most amazing matching algorithm of any site (you answer questions from "Don’t agree at all" to "Agree 100%", then you can say what you want your match to answer and finally how important their answer matching is; this enables way more than more naive sites). You can mark-up any word on your profile as a keyword. And people reply. Back then I was pretty overweight but almost every woman I messaged replied, including those with the scary "rarely replies" badge. The few times I asked they said it’s because most men who write them either just said "Hi", "Great tits", or showed they didn’t actually read their profile first. But this was all several years ago, so maybe things got worse. I know nowadays the push to pay them is a lot more heavy-handed and OkStats is gone.

eloisius 7y ago
Okc has gone to speed swiping format like everyone else. You can only message someone you match with now, which is unfortunate because you used to be able to demonstrate some kind of attractiveness other than initial appearances. I get that women have a problem filtering the deluge of low-quality messages otherwise, but I wonder if there isn’t a better way to meter the problem than mutual swiping.

deogeo 7y ago

> in western society (and in some eastern ones too), women who directly reject men are subject to male rage & women who seem too enthusiastic are subject to slut-shaming (which can also result in violence). Perhaps he would have more luck dating in a less patriarchal society, with higher gender equality?

mcv 7y ago

I was like that. Actually, I'm worse. I never got laid before I was 32. I've always been very respectful of boundaries, didn't want to impose, and due to social awkwardness, that meant I had a hard time approaching women. And to be honest, I don't really have an easy solution; in the end I met my wife and we've been happily married for 12 years now. For a while I did give up. Particularly in university, I wasn't very interested in the dating game. I did have the occasional crush, didn't know how to act on it, and when I did, it generally amounted to nothing. After 30, I decided to try this online dating, went on lots of dates, most of them amounted to nothing, then I met a woman I fell madly in love with, and she apparently with me, but we soon realised it wasn't going to work: she smoked, I hated smoking. I wanted children, she didn't. We broke up, and I soon met my wife on that same site. And I believe she was the one to contact me first, which definitely helps. That site that got me two hits in a row, wasn't a normal commercial dating site, though. It was really cheap, low threshold, aimed specifically at Christians, and not just at dating, but also at friendship. And it supported blogging. Maybe that lowered the threshold somehow. I don't know. But I've become a strong believer in non-commercial, focused on special interest, dating-but-also-friendship sites. For one thing, commercial dating sites are mostly scams. OKCupid used to love exposing those scams, but I believe they've been bought by the biggest dating scammer, so they're likely as useless as the others now. Ultimately, all you really need, is a way to meet new people with similar interests to yours. Not identical, but it helps to have some common interest, whether it's a hobby, religion, activism, or whatever. It doesn't have to be a dating site, it can be a real-life activity. It can be an online game (I know a couple that met on World of Warcraft). Make sure you can talk about something other than dating. See if you can talk to them about other stuff than dating. If it turns out you can talk to each other, ask her out for a coffee or some other small thing. Or maybe do something hobby related together, see how that works out. I suppose you've got to become more confident at making the first move if you don't want to be totally dependent on the whims of the other, but the move doesn't have to be aimed straight at dating. Though to be honest, I don't know how much my advice is worth. People like me never get a lot of dating experience; once we find the right person, we stick with them.

archagon 7y ago
Out of curiosity, what was the site?

harimau777 7y ago

Not directly related, but the biggest obstacle that I find I face is that people who share my religious background tend to be more conservative while, in terms of lifestyle and worldview, I tend to be more progressive. I find that the women who I am interested in rarely share my faith while the women who share my faith rarely share any of my interests.

whateverthisis 7y ago

Online dating has many problems, but not all failures to obtain a positive outcome from online dating are the fault of the system. It is easy to blame the system and more difficult to accept that the system is not at fault in some situations. You can't simultaneously reject the current societal dating standards but also expect that a system based on those same standards will work for you. Given this, might it make more sense to find a method of dating that is more in line with the societal standards that you seek to live by?

mcnamaratw 7y ago

There's a traditional low-tech solution to this problem, used by generations of nerds. Step 1, hang out in real life with a bunch of guys. Have fun with them. (If you're really sucked into your work, this step could take a while.) Step 2 is that women will appear and you will date them.

klyrs 7y ago

Opinionated advice, ymmv. Get off dating apps; they're toxic. Use Meetup, take a pottery class, a yoga class, join a hiking group, a book club. And crucially, don't expect any of that to yield a romantic partnership. Make friends. Go to their weddings, parties, etc. There, you might meet women who are looking for a guy like you. Or maybe one of your friendships will blossom into more. When I was single and presenting as male, I found myself in a similar conundrum. I found success in "playing hard to get," eg., rather than immediately biting at every flirt, I'd respond with low-key flirts and not escalate for some time. After I got enough consistent-seeming signs, I'd ask somebody out long before I got attached to the idea. "Hey, you wanna get lunch some time?" "Uh, do you mean a date? I've got a partner." "Oh, haha, yeah I meant a date, no worries." When you can do that without feeling devastated, you're on the right track.

deleted 7y ago
[deleted]

deleted 7y ago

[deleted]