The way you phrased it can be interpreted as the inability to allocate executable memory is for unrelated reasons but is being “spun” as a security plus post-ho

The way you phrased it can be interpreted as the inability to allocate executable memory is for unrelated reasons but is being “spun” as a security plus post-hoc, rather than the conscious consequence of a decision to prioritize security. The block on allocating executing memory flows from the security concern, rather than security “spin” flowing from the allocation restriction.