4 ms·
I would call PBS’s bias center to center-left, along with the nytimes, huffpost, the guardian, most late night shows, and most slate writers. It sounds like you
by StuffedParrot 7y ago
I would call PBS’s bias center to center-left, along with the nytimes, huffpost, the guardian, most late night shows, and most slate writers. It sounds like you are describing the wall street journal, bloomberg, the economist, the washington post. It’s pretty difficult to go further right without bumping into fox news, breitbart, the drudge report, the blaze, rush limbaugh, etc.
For actual left bias, see: the baffler, the intercept, jacobin, mother jones, counterpunch, the nation, and oddly teen vogue. If PBS is left, those are surely falling off the spectrum.
Finally podcasts cater across the spectrum. I can’t help with specific examples here, but you can certainly find anyone from anarchists and communists to democratic socialists to liberals to libertarians to blatant far right wing shit (monarchism?, “racial realists”, “trumpists”).
- thanatropism 7y ago> monarchists, racial realists, trumpists One of those things is not like the others.
- StuffedParrot 7y agoI honestly have no clue what you’re talking about.
- boring_twenties 7y agoYou must be reading a different Bloomberg than I am.
- StuffedParrot 7y agoWhat kind of economic critique do you have about Bloomberg?
- boring_twenties 7y agoI don't have any critique about Bloomberg, just your characterization of it as right wing. I can't remember ever seeing a "right-wing" viewpoint in Bloomberg's opinion pages. As far as I can tell the only op-eds they publish are pro-gun control, anti-income inequality or just generally anti-Trump.