5 ms·
You realize that we are talking about Google, right? These examples are hilarious, but also a little insulting to employees who actually need unions. Which does
by lawnchair_larry 7y ago
You realize that we are talking about Google, right? These examples are hilarious, but also a little insulting to employees who actually need unions. Which does not include any Google employees.
- PavlovsCat 7y ago> You realize that we are talking about Google, right? The context is "disagreeing with unions", which wasn't further qualified. edit: and certainly not restricted to Google. Just re-read chrisseaton's comment -- downvoting me doesn't change what's written here, it just adds the data point of dishonesty and underhanded tactics. > These examples are hilarious, but also a little insulting to employees who actually need unions. How so?
- blub 7y agoGiven that Google was illegally colluding with several other companies to keep employee salaries down, maybe said employees do need an organization to watch their backs.
- 8note 7y agoit seems to me like Google needs unions -- not for pay, but for having a bigger say in what gets made and what shouldn't be created
- redwall_hp 7y agoAnd work hours. Exploiting salaried workers with insane expectations of what amounts to unpaid overtime is a really big problem.
- AndrewBissell 7y agoIndeed, this whole particular story started when Google retaliated against employees who opposed its bid for a CBP contract.