3 ms·
They aren't using any tax dollars for Starship. It's entirely funded by their profits (at least as far as I know). And this Starship MK1 is/was a prototype des
by Klathmon 7y ago
They aren't using any tax dollars for Starship. It's entirely funded by their profits (at least as far as I know).
And this Starship MK1 is/was a prototype designed to test some aspects of their design in the real world. It was never going to be anywhere close to taking people onboard. Even this incident had all people far away before they started doing anything like pressurising.
This is active development, every single rocket company or program in existence has had explosions and test failures, and they will continue to have them. The important part is that they are doing this safely and nobody is getting hurt, these are controlled tests.
It may not be the way you think rockets should be designed and built (I'm personally kinda skeptical that they will actually build the full prototypes/rockets outside like this), but it's not more dangerous than any other rocket company.
- kev009 7y agoCitations needed for the funding. Sounds like people being loose with the truth. The accounting alone would be close to impossible to keep separate.
- Klathmon 7y agoI meant it as in no government contracts are going toward starship development, but looking it up it seems I'm actually wrong, maybe... The air force has given them some money for development on their Raptor engine, and they've talked about wanting more government funding for starship itself, but they've also talked about how starship has been privately funded so far.
- CydeWeys 7y agoTo be fair, the Raptor engine is a hell of an invention (a full flow engine!!), and well worth investing money into.