4 ms·
That's actually a legitimate feature of a swimming pool if the building doesn't have another water supply (e.g. mains water or a pond) nearby. In Australia the
by toomanybeersies 7y ago
That's actually a legitimate feature of a swimming pool if the building doesn't have another water supply (e.g. mains water or a pond) nearby.
In Australia they are a tax deductible expense as a water facility: https://www.theland.com.au/story/4330059/cool-pool-20k-tax-write-off/ https://www.theland.com.au/story/4330059/cool-pool-20k-tax-w...
- mxfh 7y agoQuite ingenious low cost reuse of a half container with prefab fibreglass inlay. Even without the tax incentive. http://shippingcontainerpools.com.au/ http://shippingcontainerpools.com.au/ https://www.instagram.com/shippingcontainerpools/ https://www.instagram.com/shippingcontainerpools/
- Havoc 7y ago>That's actually a legitimate feature of a swimming pool Yeah it was in a way legit. Lots of thatch roof houses nearby etc - if it hadn't been for the context. They built a ton of private stuff with taxpayer money and then tried to justify it later when called to account. e.g. A mini Amphitheatre because a soil retaining wall. Swimming pool became a fire pool. The chicken coop...well there their creativity failed them.