3 ms·
You don't see a difference between inheriting ill-gotten gains from several generations back and actively looting the country yourself? If there is no differen
by jjeaff 7y ago
You don't see a difference between inheriting ill-gotten gains from several generations back and actively looting the country yourself?
If there is no difference, I'm afraid all white land-owners in America are going to need to return their land to the natives.
- jlv2 7y agoMaybe you mean "all non-Native American land-owners in America". I'm not sure why you single out white.
- kick 7y agoBecause African Americans didn't get the chance to get in on the thievery angle, and most other races didn't come in significant volume early enough to have the chance to in numbers significant enough to be worth mentioning?
- thephyber 7y ago> If there is no difference, I'm afraid all white land-owners in America are going to need to return their land to the natives. I'm glad you admitted that there is an argument to be made there.
- kiliantics 7y agoIt seems you have independently discovered the reasoning behind reparations, well done.
- cylinder 7y ago> You don't see a difference between inheriting ill-gotten gains from several generations back and actively looting the country yourself? What's the difference? Why don't they return the stolen property? > If there is no difference, I'm afraid all white land-owners in America are going to need to return their land to the natives. Why shouldn't they? Have you heard of native title?
- larnmar 7y agoAnd those natives would need to return it to other natives, who would need to return it to other natives, and so on for a thousand or so generations.