3 ms·
We did fix one bug, but after the 2nd incident decided that using a tool that silently corrupts your repository is not worth the marginal benefit it provides ag
by omeze 7y ago
We did fix one bug, but after the 2nd incident decided that using a tool that silently corrupts your repository is not worth the marginal benefit it provides against alternative more naive solutions. Most companies run post-merge checks so in the event of a bad merge, the offending commit can be isolated and reverted, or have a cron running at a regular cadence to isolate the issue to a set of commits. Having your repo reflect developer’s patches is really table stakes for a tool like this anyway.