3 ms·
Seriously, that’s only 0.7 mm. It could be the diameter?
by Swenrekcah 7y ago
Seriously, that’s only 0.7 mm. It could be the diameter?
- morelisp 7y agohttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0277379113003788 https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S02773... is apparently the relevant paper. The fiber was some remnants found on stone tools, apparently. I don't have the archaeological background to say if the claim it's not possible to twist in nature in plausible or not.