4 ms·
I don't see what's wrong with that. Local First really just means distributed, fault tolerant, and eventually consistent but designed for user devices instead o
by 0xCMP 7y ago
I don't see what's wrong with that. Local First really just means distributed, fault tolerant, and eventually consistent but designed for user devices instead of a cloud "scale" service.
Why couldn't an enterprise run a "device" (a server) which others can easily sync to ("sync.enterprise.com") and which also only allows authorized users to access data which they're allowed to access? Maybe using Macaroons or something and devices can still sync locally via Bluetooth, Wifi, or whatever.
Now you have a full back up of everything on that server which IT could now more easily ensure it backed up, secured, and etc.
Not to mention the same idea could be used by a normal person just running a NAS at home or a server in DO/AWS/GCS/etc.