4 ms·
Most issues are in old implementations and on Windows, so it's not completely off base.
by snagglegaggle 7y ago
Most issues are in old implementations and on Windows, so it's not completely off base.
- planteen 7y agoSure, but there is no way this should be used as a reference in 2019. It was wrong even in 2003 when it was written - Unicode 3.0 from 1999 defined the maximum number of code points, surrogate pairs, and code points above U+FFFF. His single most important fact still rings true though, "It does not make sense to have a string without knowing what encoding it uses."